The Legacy of George W. Bush

Historian Andrew J. Bacevich has written an editorial/screed on the legacy of George W. Bush's presidency. Here are Bacevich's main points:

1. "Defined the contemporary era as an "age of terror" with an open-ended "global war" as the necessary, indeed the only logical, response;"

2. "Promulgated and implemented a doctrine of preventive war, thereby creating a far more permissive rationale for employing armed force;"

3. "Affirmed - despite the catastrophe of Sept. 11, 2001 - that the primary role of the Department of Defense is not defense, but power projection;"

4. "Removed constraints on military spending so that once more, as Ronald Reagan used to declare, "defense is not a budget item";"

5. "Enhanced the prerogatives of the imperial presidency on all matters pertaining to national security, effectively eviscerating the system of checks and balances;"

6. "Preserved and even expanded the national security state, despite the manifest shortcomings of institutions such as the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff;"

7. Preempted any inclination to question the wisdom of the post-Cold War foreign policy consensus, founded on expectations of a sole superpower exercising "global leadership";"

8."Completed the shift of US strategic priorities away from Europe and toward the Greater Middle East, the defense of Israel having now supplanted the defense of Berlin as the cause to which presidents and would-be presidents ritually declare their fealty."

This is interesting, but I think (I know) that Bacevich has an ax to grind. He does, however, make some good points, but will Bush's legacy be entirely negative? Though just about every American today will say yes, we just can't know at this point in time.

Bacevich's full article.